Great TV

Our cable provider has provided it's subscribers free Encore for a week. We don't subscribe to the premium channels because of repetitious content and, gosh, it's so expensive. Anyway, I was flipping through the channels last and found Encore Black and found Sanford and Son playing. I sat and watched this classic 70's TV show. My sides were splitting I laughed so much. Following Sanford and Son, the laughs continued as The Jeffersons came on.

What happened? Of course, modern, overly sensitive Americans would never accept Archie Bunker or George Jefferson. I certainly hope that we don't reach a point to where All in the Family, The Jeffersons or Sanford and Son are pulled and locked up in a vault somewhere. Our society is richer for these shows.

Spies in mosques

The question has come up about putting undercover police officers or informants in mosques. The Left says it is a violation of the First Amendment to put informants in mosques because it restricts the free exercise of the Islamic faith. Sorry, there is legal precedent showing that matters of national security out way parts of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Don't believe it? During the fight against the Ku Klux Klan, the Federal Bureau do Investigation (FBI) placed informants in in locations where there were likely gathering of Klan members. The FBI slipped informants in to Southern churches to root out Klansmen. It worked. During the 70s and 80s, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Alcohol, Tobacco & firearms(ATF) and Drug Enforcement Agency(DEA) placed agents and informants in several of the white supremacy organizations with religious leaders and churches. With the information gained white supremacist were arrested, charged and convicted from infiltration of religious organizations.

So, what's the difference? Since the federal law enforcement agencies have infiltrated Christian, I use the word loosely, churches they sure can infiltrate Muslim centers of worship. I have no problem with agents and informants being placed in places of worship. These infiltrators do not cause problems in the "churches." They are members of the faith they mix with and worship as everyone else. They just collect information and pass it on. No harm, no foul.

Where it's been legally done before, it can be legally done again.

Socialist take over of America.

The Socialists (what I call Democrats) have introduced the Assault Weapons Ban of 2015.  Its a bill full of ignorant blather. Using the recent mass shootings across the country, these Socialists are using fear and scare tactics to undermine the Constitution and the  Bill of Rights.Their idea is that the Second Amendment is no longer relevant in modern society. Socialists know that after the nation has been deprived of multi-round, semi-automatic rifles, the stage is set for them to further their agenda. Turning America into a Socialist state.

If the Second Amendment is relevant, how long will it take for these Socialists to decide that parts of the First Amendment are no longer relevant. It's easy to see that, too. Already is free speech curtailed. You cannot express your opinion if it does not agree with those with Socialist agendas. Several of the amendments are threatened. Due process has been under attack.

Don't think this is happening? Do you think I'm crazy? If you ask those two questions, then you have already been spoofed by the Socialists. I can, and I will, show you how it works. The Socialist agenda includes marginalize groups of people and then set them at odds with each other. Set class tension by making the rich people villains while making lower and middle classes heroes. Marginalize people who disagree with the Socialist; playing them for fools. Set the current government as evil and out of touch with the citizens then set the Socialist agenda as the friends of the mobs and people. Restrict the ownership of firearms making the citizens unable to defend themselves. The Soviets did this to form the communist in Russia. The Nazis followed the same plan when they took control of the German government. All you have to do is read Marx and the other Socialist authors to see what I'm talking about.



As a personal note: My spelling is not perfect and neither is my grammar. I express my concerns as best as I can.

So Over Sandy Hook

Let me preface this by saying that I have never lost a child.

The attack on the Sandy Hook school was horrible. There are other words to describe what happened in 2012. There are so many questions still left unanswered. There are some that will never be answered. The blame game that continues will not solve the puzzles.

I am so over Sandy Hook! This coming December it will be three years. You would think that the Sandy Hook community would be trying to move on and put the shootings to rest, as best they could. Oh no! The victim's parents and others are finding ingenious reasons to file law suits. They had the Lanza home demolished. After suing the Connecticut Board of Education, Newtown Board of Education, Bushmaster firearms, and now they are suing the estate of Nancy Lanza, Adam Lanza's mother. Who will be next victim of the legal express train?

What are we supposed to think? For me, I think that continue the legal processes are trying to get money to ease their pain. Or, they are simply wanting revenge! I wonder how much News for the parents, your lawyers are making a killing!. Besides, how much grief can be erased for $100,00? A million?

Sniper in Ferguson

Back a few weeks ago someone mentioned that snipers in combat were cowards. There was a great outcry over this because military snipers have an important roll in combat. They provide cover for advancing troops, the provide protection for dignitaries, and observe enemy movement.Their rolls are vital to combat since the  late 19th century. Law enforcement snipers serve the same roll.

Last night, two police officers in Ferguson were shot, both  in critical condition. They weren't killed close up or in  a fight with protesters. They were shot in cold blood by a sniper. Civilian snipers are not the same as those in the  military. Civilian snipers are cowards. They are not brave! They do not have honor! They are criminals. There is no  other way to define their actions as justified.

Cowards! Devils! Bastards!

I refuse to be politically correct.

People are wearing so much crap on their shirt sleeves. Everything offends them. I am tired of trying to think of what I want to say before I say it. It's rather confusing trying figure out what to say and how to say it without hurting someones feelings.

The worst offenders in the PC world are politicians, Facebook users, Twitter users and the news media. With President Obama refusing to call ISIS terrorists or Islamic extremists is allowing ISIS to do as the please. A company is New Zealand or Australia had to redo labeling because the care instructions included a statement telling the man to take to a woman. It was very tongue-in-cheek but it hurt someones feelings. I'm not even going to state on the greatest offenders,..Democrats. I am not afraid of calling them Socialist.

I am not saying I will throw away politeness or just plain rude, Yes, you should always be nice. There was a time in America when plain talk to regarded as a plus in anyone's character. Beating around the bush was considered shifty and untrustworthy. We need to bring back plain language. Stop all this pussy footing around.

If I have offended anyone, tough shit.