Sniper in Ferguson

Back a few weeks ago someone mentioned that snipers in combat were cowards. There was a great outcry over this because military snipers have an important roll in combat. They provide cover for advancing troops, the provide protection for dignitaries, and observe enemy movement.Their rolls are vital to combat since the  late 19th century. Law enforcement snipers serve the same roll.

Last night, two police officers in Ferguson were shot, both  in critical condition. They weren't killed close up or in  a fight with protesters. They were shot in cold blood by a sniper. Civilian snipers are not the same as those in the  military. Civilian snipers are cowards. They are not brave! They do not have honor! They are criminals. There is no  other way to define their actions as justified.

Cowards! Devils! Bastards!

I refuse to be politically correct.

People are wearing so much crap on their shirt sleeves. Everything offends them. I am tired of trying to think of what I want to say before I say it. It's rather confusing trying figure out what to say and how to say it without hurting someones feelings.

The worst offenders in the PC world are politicians, Facebook users, Twitter users and the news media. With President Obama refusing to call ISIS terrorists or Islamic extremists is allowing ISIS to do as the please. A company is New Zealand or Australia had to redo labeling because the care instructions included a statement telling the man to take to a woman. It was very tongue-in-cheek but it hurt someones feelings. I'm not even going to state on the greatest offenders,..Democrats. I am not afraid of calling them Socialist.

I am not saying I will throw away politeness or just plain rude, Yes, you should always be nice. There was a time in America when plain talk to regarded as a plus in anyone's character. Beating around the bush was considered shifty and untrustworthy. We need to bring back plain language. Stop all this pussy footing around.

If I have offended anyone, tough shit.

Gun Nuts?

"Gun nuts" is a phrase that is tossed around a lot by people wanting to severely curtail gun ownership in the United States. You have to ask, "What is a gun nut?" To me a gun nut is someone who has owned, trained, maintained firearms. In that I am a gun nut. I suppose when the gun control freaks talk about gun nuts they are referring to people who own hundreds of guns, millions of rounds of ammunition and carry a dozen or so on their persons. Kinda makes me think of Tackelberry from Police Academy. I hate to break it to those folks, but there are 10,000 people of my definition of gun nut to one person of the gun control freaks definition.

Who I am? I own a few guns. I've hunted for a great many years of my life; started from my pre-teens. I'm also a former police officer. I am also a veteran of the War in Iraq. There are literally thousands of people just like me. Have I ever threatened to shoot someone? Other than in a professional capacity I have never threatened anyone with a gun. So, I'm a gun nut.

You don't like me being a gun nut? Sorry, you can kiss my ass.

Judge not

How often have you been talking to a fellow Christian and something comes up about their conduct and they respond with “judge not lest ye be judged?” Frequently, you will have a non-Christian say that. They know that one phrase so well! And yes, it is true. At any rate, that response usually ends that conversation. Occasionally, the conversation ends with hurting toes and feelings. Why?

All of us have a tendency to take one phrase and take it to be all encompassing. An example is given above.  There is much, much more to it. As an instruction manual, the Bible sometimes leaves us confused, scratching our heads. While the Bible is a “how-to” book, you have to look through pages and pages until we understand the point. The instructions of Christ in Matthew 7:1 “Judge not, that ye be not judged” seem pretty straightforward. It suggests that we should never tell another Christian when they are doing something wrong. Is that what it means? Is that all there is too it? No. And, no.

Paul’s teaching in Galatians and 2nd Timothy follows up on Matthew 7:1. Galatians 6:1, “…if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted.” I look at this to mean that if you see someone committing a sin, show their sin, but do not be tempted to do so in a overbearing, superior fashion. Softly, privately, tell them their error in a loving, concerned way without being critical. This is not judging.

When pressed with explain the contradiction to Matthew 7:1, I refer to 2 Timothy 3:16-17:  “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness; that the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.” Does this make it acceptable to correct a fellow Christian? I say, “yes.” “Yes,” as long as you do it in the proper manner. Do not laud over those in error. Do not act superior or oppressive.

It is the responsibility of Christians to take care of each other. This extends to telling a fellow Christian they are sinning. As a Christian, you Salvation does not hinge on being helpful to others in this manner. In the long run, however when you stand in front of the Judge, it will not be mark of error. I think the opposite is true. Failing to help another Christian and causing a third person from seeking Salvation will be a mark that requires answering.

Help another Christian if you see them in error, but do not do so in error.

The dichotomy of wealth

We see on television and on the streets the plight of those homeless, starving people in the United States. It's a common sight. I know you've seen it. You also we commercials  of groups collecting money for the poor, uninsured people who can't afford to get medical care. The are literally dying because they cannot get good health care. I don't have to remind you of this. We are all well aware of what is going on. Yet, on the same television channel, you see commercials for Disney World, Beaches, Viking Cruises and other fabulous places to vacation.  let's not forget the commercials for Mercedes, BMW's, Jaguars and other luxury vehicles including the ones made here in the U.S.

People that are barely getting by don't need to see commercials about Beaches and Cancun. Poor children will probably see Space Mountain or ride the Harry Potter at Universal. They can only only dream of going to such places. To them the closed they are going to get to Disney World is visiting the Disney Store. The commercials are really slapping the under $20,000 a year people in the face.

I am not saying that it's a bad thing to be rich. I am not saying there is anything wrong with being poor. I am not suggesting that the money made should be taken from one and given to another. I am saying that more could be done to help those who do without. The wealthy should be more giving. Wouldn't it be great if a $200k a year family would treat a $12k a year family. Send the family on a Disney cruise. Who would it hurt?

Rubbing it in the noses of the poor does not help anyone. it does cause problems between the classes. I know you have seen those science fiction movies where one group live high in floating cities, in crystal palaces, while the other group drudge around in muck, fighting to stay alive. Well, we're getting there!

Martyrs for the cause

My theory...AND my opinion...

Because of the seeming endless failures of liberal socialists to pass stronger gun legislation, they have stepped up the pressure by using young men as martyrs. Prompting these young men to to murder helpless people and then either commit suicide or "death by cop." This gets the nations attention and forces the nation to focus on the evils of guns.

For instance,...

Every time there is a mass shooting, the parents of the suspected killers denounce gun owners and their Constitutional rights by expressing their Constitutional rights.

For the most part, mass shootings have been in liberal states. While not all mass shootings occur in these states, it is suspicious that they do.

The timing is seemingly scheduled. Every mass shooting occurs after the last one has faded away from national attention.

All the socialist or communist causes are painted with the blood of martyrs.

Notice, that the focus is not on the victims but on the murderers. There is immediate rush of sympathy for the families, but that soon passes. That is the real issue. The victims and their families need more concern that the suspect.

All the suspects suffered from depression and on anti-depressants. It is commonly referred to as being troubled or disturbed.

Not one suspect or their families has taken responsibility for their actions. Their refusal to focus on what they did or didn't do is questionable. It's easier to blame someone else or an inanimate object.

Now, they are focusing on our American heroes. 


I'm not asking you to believe, agree or anything. It just looks like a pattern has been developing.

My prophecy...there will be a mass shooting in a conservative state in the southern U.S. in 4-6 months time.

So, Texting and Driving is Illegal?

Tennessee state law says that texting while driving is illegal. That's only on paper. People really don't care. In a recent trip through Nashville, I was passed with literally dozens of drivers confidently texting. Even saw a woman in a new Mercedes happily texting with her right hand. In the past few weeks, I even say a nice sticker on a car that warned against texting and driving. Yep, the driver was texting! Tell me there's a law that makes texting while driving illegal. You would think there would be cars lined up along the shoulder of the highway texting away. Nope! Furthermore, it doesn't seem to matter for the police.

The State's website, Top Ten Traffic Safety Laws for TN Visitors , has texting as the number one law to know. Really! Go look at the address. Tennesseans don't obey the law, so why should visitors. The no texting law in Tennessee has no teeth. If you get a ticket for texting and driving, it is a maximum $60 fine and no points on your driver's license. I see it as useless! If you want to really stop people from texting behind the wheel, make it $1000 fine and 30 days in jail with increasing penalties for multiple offenses. The DUI law hasn't stopped drinking and driving with it's stiff penalties! How would you expect a wimpy no texting law to stop those with the criminal mentality to text!

Texting while driving is like Prohibition. It just doesn't work!